Update on Sodium Citrate, blood and urine

(and meeting link for paid subscribers for Thursday 8am Brisbane time)

Firstly, Happy New Year Y’all!

I hope that 2024 is great (or least not a disaster) for as many of us as possible.

11th March 2024 will mark the 4th anniversary of Tedros declaring the Covid plandemic up and running and 3/11/20 was also the commencement of World War 3 if you accept this date as when things kicked off in earnest…

In local news Brisbane company Vaxxas has been given the given the green light to trial a vaccine patch utilising the nanotechnology developed by Prof Mark Kendall of the University of Queensland - the “nano-patch”.

Professor Kendall received a 2015 award from the WEF and “he currently serves” on the WEF Global Future Council on Biotechnology.

According to the Vaxxas website:

Vaxxas is targeting initial applications in infectious disease and oncology and has forged collaborations with leading global organizations in vaccine commercialization, including Merck/MSD, the United States Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Cool, sounds safer and more effective… what could possibly go wrong?

With regard to sodium citrate Karl and I continue to receive very positive feedback from people that have tried it for a week or two. It can be less well tolerated by those with liver or kidney problems or sensitive stomachs - nausea being the main issue. I am currently suggesting 0.5-1g as a starting dose twice a day. Although I do not currently have medical registration so please do your own research.

The other thing that we have noted is some people find that supplementing with larger doses helps them feel much better and doses of 10g twice a day are generally well tolerated but I would not suggest starting at this dose and I would think that taking it with food would be sensible.

I looked at the blood today of somebody taking 20g of sodium citrate daily for the last two weeks. He feels considerably better but difficult to conclude other than that his blood looks similar to everybody else’s that I have looked at within the last few months.

Which only means that looking at the blood is not a good biomarker or gauge as to severity of progress rather than the fact the sodium citrate is not useful. There could be a number of reasons such as severity of contamination and ongoing toxin exposure. I am confident that sodium citrate is proving to be a useful tool in the toolkit.

The urine may prove to be more useful as a biomarker but this is an ongoing area of investigation however I include a few photos for interest.

I have received some feedback that people would like more information about what we are actually seeing and I will do a zoom soon with Karl and a small group to discuss this in detail.

I also quite like the idea of an online conference on darkfield microscopy - the inaugural “Take a walk on the Dark Side, 2024”. With guest appearance of Karl C as Morpheus or possibly (I am not your father) Dark Vader although I kinda want to see Karl in those glasses and wielding a F$*k off EMP blaster.

Apologies of course this is serious.

Blood. Darkfield mostly at 200x magnification. Lots of gel, lots of dots and a few structures.

And more from the urine:

Busy start to the year. Off to northern New South Wales tomorrow or Thursday depending on how things come together. Meeting with Greg Fredericks on Saturday to discuss the 4th Edition of his book Darkfield Warriors:

I have a similar picture to the image in the photo above but I have no idea what it is so I look forward to finding out!

I hope that the week and year has started well or at last OK!

David