Stunning, beautiful, and deeply disturbing. Thank you for your incredible work David. You write like a poet which makes these observations hit even harder.
Thank you Sally — that means a great deal. I am trying to write in a way that preserves both the beauty and the seriousness of what has been observed. The difficulty is holding both at once.
Beyond beautiful! You dear Dr. have named a huge problem, in all areas of human doing and knowledge 💕. Noticing The process is key to just begin understanding anything, and everything still must remain open to reexamining and reevaluating.
Language is a huge problem as you've stated and articulated well. The analogy of the Caterpillar, chrysalis, butterfly is brilliant. The "magic" is glossed over. The nouns win the thought space over verbs that remain incomplete and inadequate, as that requires much more attention and time.
Grateful for your human upgrade! I dare say it is so much needed in all aspects of human thinking and doing.
Thank you Susan — beautifully put. Yes, language is both necessary and dangerous. The nouns help us think, but they can also close the door too early. The living process is often in the verbs, and that requires attention, patience, and a willingness to re-examine what we thought we understood.
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and insights. This article is beautifully written, it touches the core of my heart. I'll do my best to share your knowledge with others. We MUST re-learn how to observe more attentively and patiently!
Thank you Tatjana. Yes — careful observation and patience are central. I think many of these processes are missed because they do not present themselves in the scale, timing, or language we have been trained to recognise.
This is exactly what is wrong with 'education'. Instead of giving students the means to discover themselves, they are like parrots just learning words. How much more interesting would it be, to look in the microscope and find out what they see! Instead of putting a label on 3 or 4 symptoms, a doctor should ask lots of questions, about food, lifestyle, habits, sleep! I think doctors should also make house visits, because one can be very different in the office compared to home. Too much book-knowledge, and way too short on hands-on.
Thank you Ingrid. I agree with the deeper point: medicine needs more observation, more careful questioning, and less automatic reduction of people to labels. The difficulty is that many doctors now work inside systems that make this very hard — short appointments, administrative load, protocols, and throughput pressure. So I do not see it simply as a failure of individual doctors, but as a structural problem. The loss of observation and continuity of care is central.
David your correct & descriptive words flowed so beautifully & intelligently together that it made me cry; in recognition of my own thoughts, observations & participation of Independent Research looking through a microscope over the past 16 years.
Technical question," David does your microscope have a halogen globe or LED light source?."
Thank you David for your Excellent research contributions to the World.
Thank you Carlene, I really appreciate your kind words and your years of independent observation. My microscope uses the factory standard 9W LED light source rather than a halogen globe. We have experimented with higher wattage LED light sources, but the images in this article and the atlases come from the standard setup unless otherwise indicated.
Thank you Kathryn. Yes, the geological time scale is a very good comparison. Some processes are missed because they unfold outside the scale and tempo we are trained to notice. The implications are certainly broad, which is part of the difficulty.
The human eye can see between 430 and 770 Thz. Our ears can detect sound between 20hz and 20Khz. These ranges make up a fraction of the total sound and light frequency range. This means there is a lot going on around us that you cant see or hear.
Which brings me to say; not believing in aliens is like taking a spoon full of sea water and saying there is no shark in the ocean because there is none in my spoon. 👽
Yes, exactly — our ordinary sensory range is only a small window onto what is occurring around us. But in this case the point is slightly different. I am not saying there is no shark in the ocean because it is absent from the teaspoon. I am saying there appears to be a fin in the teaspoon itself — only it is microscopic, and moving very, very slowly. And at this stage, I do not think it is a dolphin.
Someone indicated to me that they thought there was alien (from another planet) biologics in the Covid-19 injection but I was incredulous so he blocked me. Then other things have come up, like SAM's detection of the hexagonal details in blood and some eyes - pupils in some light and it is similar to what he told me. Before I was incredulous.
Interesting to note that Dr Lynn Rothschild from NASA works on synthetic biology. And she is connected with the Stanford iGEM BIOME who are interested in 'directed evolution'. I really should do more research into that because I'm sure there is a big story in it. I'll put some references below in case anyone else is interested in this subject.
This made me laugh Shona, we are so short-sighted. When outside with my animals, I tend to bend down to their heighth and listen carefully as to what they observe. Thankfully there was no shark in my spoon either!
I miss my dog, she could filter noises like natural and unnatural. She would wake from a deep sleep if someone tried to open the sliding door but the birds could be screaming during a dead of night (I assumed) microwave weapons attack and she would sleep through it. The cat too.
Dogs are truly a master piece. Mine is now 11 years old, and last year we had a health scare that makes me grateful for every day she wakes up next to me. She woke me up end 2024 when the hurricane came close to our home. I would probably have slept through it LOL. She is a very good sleeper, I go out to the bathroom and she won't notice. B an insect inside, she hears it.
Sometimes it is like I can see her being held in Jesus arms like a lamb. She was a Havanese, curly hair, and did resemble a lamb sometimes. Only then I have peace.
In order to better comprehend the material, they are self replicating expanding xenobots propably creating networks connecting to outer terminals and interfering with our biology changing us forever?
One of the most articulate, insightful, layered, analytical pieces I’ve ever read … if not THE most. Thank you for expressing all the above in a form any literate mind can understand.
Thank you Claudia — that means a great deal. I have been trying to find a way to express the observations without losing either the complexity or the human importance of the problem.
So, when you know what you see, then you have to ask yourself, who created this technology? Was it humans working in soft mater nanotech 10 years ago, or was the technology given to them? Also, who pushed the people in DARPA to put this technology out there without consent before it was proven and ready for deployment? The human doctors who developed this and put it out, did they not realize it was not ready? Who was influencing them not to see the obvious? I don't think this technology originated with humans.
Thank you for your continued efforts. I try to spread your work when I find receptive people. I refuse to go to the dentist until I find uncontaminated anaesthetics or I am in so much pain I have no choice. Help us find clean sources.
Sorry to bother you but someone in Australia said he can't view my Substack, he sent me a screenshot and the screen was black. Can you view inside my posts? Sorry. I know you are busy.
Hi Shona, I can see your posts from here, so it does not look as though your Substack is unavailable generally. A black screen sounds more like a local loading/display issue than a platform-wide block. It might be worth asking him to try a different browser, clear cache/cookies, turn off VPN/ad blockers temporarily, or open the post in an incognito/private window. If others in Australia report the same thing, then it may point to something broader, but one black-screen report sounds more technical than regulatory.
Then that person on X asked me to give him a summary of my findings in DM's, so I baited him using General Mike Flynn and news about pedophile snuff movies of Trump about to be released by Sarah Ransome, and he blocked me, so it looks like he was US DoD. Thanks anyway!
A really excellently written article! Unfortunately, only very few people worldwide know about it to this day, they don't take the time to deal with it or they still deny the facts!
Nanotechnology has been researched for almost 30 years, and billions of dollars have been spent. The technology has become so sophisticated that its mechanisms are extremely difficult to understand. However, one thing should be clear to everyone: every foreign particle/nanoparticle, no matter how tiny or invisible to the naked eye, can cause enormous damage. Furthermore, this technology has advanced to the point where it can be programmed and controlled by electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
We can read: "“Existing platforms could apply magnetic field and do the fluoroscopy procedure at the same time to the patient, and the doctor could be in the other room, ‼️or even in a different city‼️, controlling the magnetic field with a joystick,” Kim says. “Our hope is to leverage existing technologies to test our robotic thread in vivo in the next step.” (well.... the next step came then 2020/2021 etc. etc....)
There is a vast array of different materials used, and humanity has been unknowingly used as test subjects for research purposes since the beginning of this abnormal research, this, too, should be clear to everyone by now. It should also be clear that nanoparticles can easily cross the blood-brain barrier and be passed from the mother to the unborn child via the umbilical cord. And so-called "synthetic biology" can never exist, as biology is always observational and has never been verified. No one has ever isolated anything from a living organism. We can take snapshots with MRI, CT, ultrasound, etc., but the processes and phenomena/entities involved that lead to a specific disease pattern will always remain a mystery. There is speculation, assumptions, hypothesization, and theorizing, but no verifiable science is involved, as everything has and is always been a fictitious and imaginary construct from the beginning, taking place in fraudulent in vitro culture experiments (in an artificial environment outside a living body) and in silico experiments (with software on a PC – and software exists for everything using ridiculous groups of letters) in laboratories, and has absolutely nothing to do with verifiable science or with reality!
And we know since these last toxic chemical substances 100% that the majority of disease patterns and killings have always been triggered by so-called "vaccinations"/poisonings, also in the past, since the human organism desperately tries to detoxify after that, which is then declared as so-called "side effects"! And people are still dying from these toxic chemical substances with nanoparticles, nanotechnology!!
an attempt was made to research and make public as much as possible, but unfortunately, the facts still deny too many and unfortunately too many still believe in the lies!
Also, Prof. Burkhardt et al. initially investigated these toxic-chemical substances
Thank you Mary-Ann. There is clearly a very large body of material and concern around nanotechnology, synthetic biology, EMF-responsive systems, pathology findings, and related research programmes. I agree that much of this deserves careful scrutiny.
For this article, though, I am trying to stay close to what I can document directly: microscopy, video sequences, field changes, scale, timing, and the difficulty of recognising processes that do not fit familiar categories. I think that is where my contribution is strongest.
The broader historical and technological context matters, but I am trying not to get ahead of the observations. My aim is to make the visual material available so others can examine it carefully and ask whether ordinary explanations are sufficient.
We have a digital twin, and it's also connected to satellites... stalkers have apps that can track us like a stolen smartphone... they receive an email alert when we leave the house... they can program our behavior and make us commit suicide... they can predict our daily schedules 18 hours in advance... a bit like Dr. Jackie and Mr. Hyde... we're cyborgs, but they want to play tricks on us when all the information is on social media. I use frequencies to reset my mind control... the first minute and the last 30 seconds, exhaling and pushing the synthetic telepathy voices out of my head.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I am trying to keep this particular thread focused on directly observed microscopy, video documentation, and what can be examined from the material itself. There are many wider questions people are trying to make sense of, but for this work I think it is important to stay close to what can be observed, reviewed, and discussed carefully.
Stunning, beautiful, and deeply disturbing. Thank you for your incredible work David. You write like a poet which makes these observations hit even harder.
Thank you Sally — that means a great deal. I am trying to write in a way that preserves both the beauty and the seriousness of what has been observed. The difficulty is holding both at once.
Beyond beautiful! You dear Dr. have named a huge problem, in all areas of human doing and knowledge 💕. Noticing The process is key to just begin understanding anything, and everything still must remain open to reexamining and reevaluating.
Language is a huge problem as you've stated and articulated well. The analogy of the Caterpillar, chrysalis, butterfly is brilliant. The "magic" is glossed over. The nouns win the thought space over verbs that remain incomplete and inadequate, as that requires much more attention and time.
Grateful for your human upgrade! I dare say it is so much needed in all aspects of human thinking and doing.
Hugs dear man :)
Thank you Susan — beautifully put. Yes, language is both necessary and dangerous. The nouns help us think, but they can also close the door too early. The living process is often in the verbs, and that requires attention, patience, and a willingness to re-examine what we thought we understood.
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and insights. This article is beautifully written, it touches the core of my heart. I'll do my best to share your knowledge with others. We MUST re-learn how to observe more attentively and patiently!
Thank you Tatjana. Yes — careful observation and patience are central. I think many of these processes are missed because they do not present themselves in the scale, timing, or language we have been trained to recognise.
This is exactly what is wrong with 'education'. Instead of giving students the means to discover themselves, they are like parrots just learning words. How much more interesting would it be, to look in the microscope and find out what they see! Instead of putting a label on 3 or 4 symptoms, a doctor should ask lots of questions, about food, lifestyle, habits, sleep! I think doctors should also make house visits, because one can be very different in the office compared to home. Too much book-knowledge, and way too short on hands-on.
Thank you Ingrid. I agree with the deeper point: medicine needs more observation, more careful questioning, and less automatic reduction of people to labels. The difficulty is that many doctors now work inside systems that make this very hard — short appointments, administrative load, protocols, and throughput pressure. So I do not see it simply as a failure of individual doctors, but as a structural problem. The loss of observation and continuity of care is central.
David your correct & descriptive words flowed so beautifully & intelligently together that it made me cry; in recognition of my own thoughts, observations & participation of Independent Research looking through a microscope over the past 16 years.
Technical question," David does your microscope have a halogen globe or LED light source?."
Thank you David for your Excellent research contributions to the World.
Blessings Love & Gratitude Carlene
Thank you Carlene, I really appreciate your kind words and your years of independent observation. My microscope uses the factory standard 9W LED light source rather than a halogen globe. We have experimented with higher wattage LED light sources, but the images in this article and the atlases come from the standard setup unless otherwise indicated.
Thank you Dr.Nixon, keep up the good work. We need more people like you in this world.
Thank you Amy — I really appreciate your encouragement.
Wonderful essay. It reminds me of the significance of the geologic time scale.
But yes , as several commentators have noted, the implications of David’s observations are many and terrifying.
Thank you Kathryn. Yes, the geological time scale is a very good comparison. Some processes are missed because they unfold outside the scale and tempo we are trained to notice. The implications are certainly broad, which is part of the difficulty.
The human eye can see between 430 and 770 Thz. Our ears can detect sound between 20hz and 20Khz. These ranges make up a fraction of the total sound and light frequency range. This means there is a lot going on around us that you cant see or hear.
Which brings me to say; not believing in aliens is like taking a spoon full of sea water and saying there is no shark in the ocean because there is none in my spoon. 👽
Yes, exactly — our ordinary sensory range is only a small window onto what is occurring around us. But in this case the point is slightly different. I am not saying there is no shark in the ocean because it is absent from the teaspoon. I am saying there appears to be a fin in the teaspoon itself — only it is microscopic, and moving very, very slowly. And at this stage, I do not think it is a dolphin.
Someone indicated to me that they thought there was alien (from another planet) biologics in the Covid-19 injection but I was incredulous so he blocked me. Then other things have come up, like SAM's detection of the hexagonal details in blood and some eyes - pupils in some light and it is similar to what he told me. Before I was incredulous.
Interesting to note that Dr Lynn Rothschild from NASA works on synthetic biology. And she is connected with the Stanford iGEM BIOME who are interested in 'directed evolution'. I really should do more research into that because I'm sure there is a big story in it. I'll put some references below in case anyone else is interested in this subject.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tUo0IzDquo (Dr Lynn Rothschild)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmKOAD6brmY (Dr Steven Greer, alien consciousness is encoded in our technology)
https://shonaduncan.substack.com/p/the-covid-19-show-trans-dimensional (you will find another video of Dr Lynn Rothschild in here, most of the relevant stuff is under Dark Quantum Technology, but it is all related).
This made me laugh Shona, we are so short-sighted. When outside with my animals, I tend to bend down to their heighth and listen carefully as to what they observe. Thankfully there was no shark in my spoon either!
I miss my dog, she could filter noises like natural and unnatural. She would wake from a deep sleep if someone tried to open the sliding door but the birds could be screaming during a dead of night (I assumed) microwave weapons attack and she would sleep through it. The cat too.
Dogs are truly a master piece. Mine is now 11 years old, and last year we had a health scare that makes me grateful for every day she wakes up next to me. She woke me up end 2024 when the hurricane came close to our home. I would probably have slept through it LOL. She is a very good sleeper, I go out to the bathroom and she won't notice. B an insect inside, she hears it.
Sometimes it is like I can see her being held in Jesus arms like a lamb. She was a Havanese, curly hair, and did resemble a lamb sometimes. Only then I have peace.
you are doing gods work
Thank you — I appreciate that.
In order to better comprehend the material, they are self replicating expanding xenobots propably creating networks connecting to outer terminals and interfering with our biology changing us forever?
One of the most articulate, insightful, layered, analytical pieces I’ve ever read … if not THE most. Thank you for expressing all the above in a form any literate mind can understand.
Thank you Claudia — that means a great deal. I have been trying to find a way to express the observations without losing either the complexity or the human importance of the problem.
Brilliant. ❤️🙏
Thank you Karen ❤️🙏
So, when you know what you see, then you have to ask yourself, who created this technology? Was it humans working in soft mater nanotech 10 years ago, or was the technology given to them? Also, who pushed the people in DARPA to put this technology out there without consent before it was proven and ready for deployment? The human doctors who developed this and put it out, did they not realize it was not ready? Who was influencing them not to see the obvious? I don't think this technology originated with humans.
Thank you for your continued efforts. I try to spread your work when I find receptive people. I refuse to go to the dentist until I find uncontaminated anaesthetics or I am in so much pain I have no choice. Help us find clean sources.
Sorry to bother you but someone in Australia said he can't view my Substack, he sent me a screenshot and the screen was black. Can you view inside my posts? Sorry. I know you are busy.
Hi Shona, I can see your posts from here, so it does not look as though your Substack is unavailable generally. A black screen sounds more like a local loading/display issue than a platform-wide block. It might be worth asking him to try a different browser, clear cache/cookies, turn off VPN/ad blockers temporarily, or open the post in an incognito/private window. If others in Australia report the same thing, then it may point to something broader, but one black-screen report sounds more technical than regulatory.
Then that person on X asked me to give him a summary of my findings in DM's, so I baited him using General Mike Flynn and news about pedophile snuff movies of Trump about to be released by Sarah Ransome, and he blocked me, so it looks like he was US DoD. Thanks anyway!
A really excellently written article! Unfortunately, only very few people worldwide know about it to this day, they don't take the time to deal with it or they still deny the facts!
Nanotechnology has been researched for almost 30 years, and billions of dollars have been spent. The technology has become so sophisticated that its mechanisms are extremely difficult to understand. However, one thing should be clear to everyone: every foreign particle/nanoparticle, no matter how tiny or invisible to the naked eye, can cause enormous damage. Furthermore, this technology has advanced to the point where it can be programmed and controlled by electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
https://maryann11.substack.com/p/what-is-nanopathology-an-interview
Architecture and Planning already in 1995:
https://www.comsoc.org/node/19826
Just one example:
https://news.mit.edu/2019/robot-brain-blood-vessels-0828
We can read: "“Existing platforms could apply magnetic field and do the fluoroscopy procedure at the same time to the patient, and the doctor could be in the other room, ‼️or even in a different city‼️, controlling the magnetic field with a joystick,” Kim says. “Our hope is to leverage existing technologies to test our robotic thread in vivo in the next step.” (well.... the next step came then 2020/2021 etc. etc....)
There is a vast array of different materials used, and humanity has been unknowingly used as test subjects for research purposes since the beginning of this abnormal research, this, too, should be clear to everyone by now. It should also be clear that nanoparticles can easily cross the blood-brain barrier and be passed from the mother to the unborn child via the umbilical cord. And so-called "synthetic biology" can never exist, as biology is always observational and has never been verified. No one has ever isolated anything from a living organism. We can take snapshots with MRI, CT, ultrasound, etc., but the processes and phenomena/entities involved that lead to a specific disease pattern will always remain a mystery. There is speculation, assumptions, hypothesization, and theorizing, but no verifiable science is involved, as everything has and is always been a fictitious and imaginary construct from the beginning, taking place in fraudulent in vitro culture experiments (in an artificial environment outside a living body) and in silico experiments (with software on a PC – and software exists for everything using ridiculous groups of letters) in laboratories, and has absolutely nothing to do with verifiable science or with reality!
And we know since these last toxic chemical substances 100% that the majority of disease patterns and killings have always been triggered by so-called "vaccinations"/poisonings, also in the past, since the human organism desperately tries to detoxify after that, which is then declared as so-called "side effects"! And people are still dying from these toxic chemical substances with nanoparticles, nanotechnology!!
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/archive
Here,
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100010418170852
an attempt was made to research and make public as much as possible, but unfortunately, the facts still deny too many and unfortunately too many still believe in the lies!
Also, Prof. Burkhardt et al. initially investigated these toxic-chemical substances
https://pathologie-konferenz.de/SEM_AZ_BP_JJ_short_online.pdf
Austrian Research Group presents Its findings of undeclared components in these toxic poison substances(2021)
https://rumble.com/vtiw2s-austrian-research-group-presents-its-findings-of-undeclared-components-in-t.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o -
https://odysee.com/@en:a5/PK_Tot-durch-Impfung_english:a
- https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid02pUjEd59U5G8zkunFvu9Egw12L1uucRhdaHk2JwYL2KzG8CUs46ybA16pgNjkzKc3l&id=100010418170852
- although he then switched to the non-existent "spike protein"... unfortunately, probably to avoid not being attacked or discriminated against....
Thank you Mary-Ann. There is clearly a very large body of material and concern around nanotechnology, synthetic biology, EMF-responsive systems, pathology findings, and related research programmes. I agree that much of this deserves careful scrutiny.
For this article, though, I am trying to stay close to what I can document directly: microscopy, video sequences, field changes, scale, timing, and the difficulty of recognising processes that do not fit familiar categories. I think that is where my contribution is strongest.
The broader historical and technological context matters, but I am trying not to get ahead of the observations. My aim is to make the visual material available so others can examine it carefully and ask whether ordinary explanations are sufficient.
We have a digital twin, and it's also connected to satellites... stalkers have apps that can track us like a stolen smartphone... they receive an email alert when we leave the house... they can program our behavior and make us commit suicide... they can predict our daily schedules 18 hours in advance... a bit like Dr. Jackie and Mr. Hyde... we're cyborgs, but they want to play tricks on us when all the information is on social media. I use frequencies to reset my mind control... the first minute and the last 30 seconds, exhaling and pushing the synthetic telepathy voices out of my head.
Ps:they use "vacuum" technology.
https://youtu.be/2_bbrzXpXVk?is=GTs0HaAjPNXXF1v7
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRp2b5wD/
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I am trying to keep this particular thread focused on directly observed microscopy, video documentation, and what can be examined from the material itself. There are many wider questions people are trying to make sense of, but for this work I think it is important to stay close to what can be observed, reviewed, and discussed carefully.
this tik tok in slides good summqary of na no & implications