Blaming the tools

When I was at school I can remember handing in a sub-standard assignment and being chastised with “a bad worker blames his tools”. I am fairly sure this was due to some obviously poor excuse to explain my messy handwriting… (it’s got worse)

This is NOT that.

This is a big deal and I expect this is deliberately being done to distract from what is really going on. Let me explain.

Since the time of the vaccine roll out health practitioners that perform checks on live blood have noted abnormalities in the blood. This has included clumping of red blood cells so-called ‘rouleaux’, ribbon like structures and homogenous lumps of amorphous material which have been labelled as biofilm, protoplasts or crystals. I am still unsure what we are looking at. There has been a lot of attention to these abnormalities but not by mainstream media, obviously. Here is a short article I wrote last year: https://drdavidnixon.com/1/en/topic/what-s-in-the-blood. I wrote it as a short follow up to an article in the spectator:

Over the last 18 months the form and structure of the abnormalities has changed. At the end of March this year we held a small meeting of interested practitioners and over three days we took several hundred photos. A selection are below:

There are those that would dismiss these abnormalities as “fibre and dust”, which rolls of the tongue as easily as “salt and cholesterol” but is equally unhelpful. Dr Rima Laibow refers to them as Frequency Responsive Self Assembling Structures, (FRSAS), which is far more useful.

The pattern of abnormalities has changed over time. Initially these were only seen in the vaccinated but this quickly changed, within months, to include the unvaccinated. Clearly this implies either a shedding phenomenon or an alternative source other than the vaccine, or both. A taxonomy of what we are seeing is beyond the scope of this post however I will discuss further in the near future.

For some time a colleague has been convinced that there is significant contamination on the coverslips that we have been using. I thought he was mistaken but after spending a few hours dipping coverslips in and out of HCL acid, water and other solutions I am also convinced.

This is not just a matter of dirty coverslips such as can be bought cheaply online. A move that I came to regret after getting shards of glass in my fingers trying to clean them. Nor is this a result of dusty offices or poor technique.

The solution to having to spend time cleaning coverslips is to buy more expensive coverslips. The ones that I purchased recently are also made in China but they come in a sealed container and look perfect to the naked eye. We have also checked cover slips made in Germany which are even more pricy however they are also affected with what appears to be exactly the same contamination - go figure.

Just to clarify the cover slip (=cover glass) is the thin sheet of glass that is carefully (most times!) -placed on top of the sample which is sitting on the slide. This improves clarity and provides a uniform focal length. My colleague occasionally takes a small sample of blood which does not cover the whole face area of the cover slip. On occasion he noted the presence of structures either on the top of the coverslip or away from the blood sample. Simple washing with detergent of alcohol did not stop this problem. Hence the HCL acid. Washing with HCL acid did not sort the problem. Well not for the length of time that we used which was approximately 15-20 secs.

This is what a perfectly good-looking coverslip looked like after it has been in acid and cleaned in distilled water:

Here is an example of an unwashed coverslip carefully placed with suspected contamination face down. This one shows a typical structure and extensive rouleaux:

We found that when we used unwashed, 30 year old cover slips (my colleague has been doing this for a while) the blood looked like this:

The remaining coverslips had various degrees of contamination despite been though an acid wash. This photo shows contamination remaining on top of the cover slip:

This one shows degraded contamination:

Over the last 3 and half years we have seen some unbelievable deception whether it be the “safe and effective” mantra, the mandates, the masks, the asymptomatic infection… the list goes on and on … and on.

I would like to add deliberate contamination of laboratory equipment.

This is a lot of trouble to go to to confuse and discredit - I think it is a deliberate distraction.

It reminds me of a TV documentary on WW2 I watched relatively recently (which means it feels like years ago but almost certainly wasn’t)… the comment was made that the “bigger the offensive: the greater the deception.”

https://nanocluster.mit.edu/publications

I am not for a moment implying that the Bawendi group are involved but this photo which depicts “Wizard Moungi” in Gollumesque pose does raise the question in my mind “FFS! What Could Possibly Go Wrong???”

It does make sense then to distract us with the “ribbons and the rouleaux” whilst the “dots” and the “lumps” are installed. This will take a bit of explaining so I will leave you with a bit of a teaser…

This is darkfield using 100x oil immersion objective producing 1000x magnification and shows a neutrophil which appears to be chasing a blue dancing dot. Blood was provided by a 28 year old male patient who had previously received 2 doses of Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine. Significant adverse events included myocardial infarction, fatigue, asthma, blurred vision, rash, brain fog and EMR sensitivity. He had been fasting for 15 hours prior to the his sample been taken.

Back with more dots and lumps soon.

David

PS Elvis makes an appearance at 5:53