You are wrong, Mr. Doctor. People die from graphene, not from the supposed polymers or hydrogel. Again, when you prove that what you are seeing is hydrogel or polymers with a chemical analysis and publish it so that other scientists know about you, although most of them already know who you are, then we can believe you. Meanwhile, you ar…
You are wrong, Mr. Doctor. People die from graphene, not from the supposed polymers or hydrogel. Again, when you prove that what you are seeing is hydrogel or polymers with a chemical analysis and publish it so that other scientists know about you, although most of them already know who you are, then we can believe you. Meanwhile, you are a smoke seller.
Hydrogel has been used in medicine since 1932, and you are trying to fool some that this is the cause of the deaths that have occurred since 2021? You have to be miserable to keep fooling people.
Also please give me your best description of the pathway which causes the onset of rapid clotting in a persons body without hydrogel and or tonnes of proteins polymerizing? This will be fun......... I am sure many will be interested in the logic you provide here. I genuinely would love you to educate me and others.
That someone who calls himself a doctor asks me this says a lot about his professional training!! Don't you know what research is? Are you from Ryan Cole and Co.?
There are many scientific studies that show that graphene oxide is a supercoagulant and causes blood clots.
Demonstrate how hydrogel produces MAC addresses!!! Either it produces neurodegeneration, or it attacks the liver, or the kidney, or it produces infertility, or it attacks the heart, inflaming it. Or how it produces magnetism in people. You are miserable!!
I repeat, you have to be miserable to continue deceiving people, and on top of that, charge them money to continue deceiving!!! Fortunately, more and more people know how to identify fake scientists dressed in white coats.
It has been done by other scientists such as clifford carnicom and by others in Europe. The morphology of polymers and hydrogel is not anything like the construction of graphene based nano technology, it may be involved. If you cannot see that from the images or see that we have even dyed those structures and performed other techniques that showed synthetic polymer structures such as the actual spherulites forming then I guess it is best for you to go with the graphene story. Exotic proteins and RNA, DNA and various other stuff has been identified and exposed publicly online from credible sources, these are the kinds of material that compliment hydrogel born scaffolds, not graphene BASED forms which are simpler when used alone. Please go do your own homework and quit cheer leading others work for which you do not understand. No one is saying it does not contain some graphene, It is just not by far the main ingredient across the broad range of constituents involved in the whole package respecting the knowledge that is driven to us by several sources and not just the shots. Hydrogel is a matrix which can hold cargo (the base materials) and the constructors. It is all you need to create any scaffolding tech from, whether bio or nano. It can hold multiple scaffolds. I don't think you understand how hydrogels work, or what their applications are. You insight that hydrogels are just a harmless medical product, this absolutely proves you know nothing of hydrogel at all. Many of the most nefarious nano, transhuman type bio-warfare products show on papers to be based on hydrogels, gazzilions of papers have been posted by the public highlighting that fact. What an earth are you saying MR EXPERT PERI?
Cute that you think we are completely and utterly stupid, but also kind of insulting. Oh and by the way, if it was Graphene then science lab safety procedure documents would indicate that H202 is an extremely effective detox and removal agent for it. SO WHY IS THAT NOT CURING PEOPLE ?
Did I also mention that the La Quinta connection said it was aliens? :D Yep, id go with that one buddy. Doesn't suspect at all. :D
Where is the chemical analysis of those other scientists you say? What magazine is it published in? Give me scientific proof that a chemical analysis has been done by looking at those graphene ribbons that you present in this substack and that says that it is a hydrogel. Where is? The scientific community wants to see it. Is the work published in a serious magazine? No? That way we can laugh a little.
You and your colleagues are only here to hide the truth about graphene. Everyone knows that you are the False Dissidence, you neither talk about graphene nor cite the work of Dr. Campra (2021) and another dozen doctors who have PUBLISHED his work where they only see graphene oxide.
How curious that all serious scientists publish their work for the rest of the scientific community. But there are charlatans who are hired to hide the truth from others.
Some may be fooled here, but the entire world already knows what is killing people, with scientific evidence, not quackery.
You've seen the images people post, and you've seen the polymer behavior, hydrogels, protecells etc. Go figure it for yourself. We don't entertaint cheerleaders. I've made an honest point, there may be some graphene involvement, but it is not the main constituent if it is there. We can't detect graphene YET! We need hplc and other devices for that which are on the way. But what we can see with the microscope we have posted and it doesn't look anything like being JUST graphene. I'm sorry you don't like it and make it all personal by implying all kinds of dishonorable things towards us. At the same time we are only being honest from what we've been seeing. You are entitled to your opinions also, I only hope that in a little while you don't feel bad for this when you find out that we were likely right. We can actually clearly see these other constituents and it is not a solely graphene built technology at all. There is a lot more than that going on. That's our point on this right now, and it is what we spend everyday trying to do.......find the truth. You are not helping us by creating big cheerleader rants for Dr campra. Please go pretend to be a an all knowing genius elsewhere and leave the insult there too. I am not ammused to play child's games as if I find this stuff fun. I gave up my entire life to work on this stuff and I didn't do it to deal with misinformation wars. Respectively, tread carefully when you do not understand enough about what you are seeing in images or morphology micrographs. You do not have the knowledge to doubt what we have shown so far, all you can do is hope that the one narrative you have chosen to follow is the right one and preach it elsewhere, we have no time for this kind of great thinking. Sorry, but save us all the know it all fan club attitude. Kindest regards!
Well, maybe I sound a bit annoyed there. I just can't stand the silly logic considering what we are dealing with. Thanks for being a star. I've been sooooo busy I haven't been ae to catch up this week, but I plan on catching up with you soon. Forgot my password for mail box and had to reset it, so I can't read last weeks messages without remembering the old password to access those. Chat soon hopefully x
You are wrong, Mr. Doctor. People die from graphene, not from the supposed polymers or hydrogel. Again, when you prove that what you are seeing is hydrogel or polymers with a chemical analysis and publish it so that other scientists know about you, although most of them already know who you are, then we can believe you. Meanwhile, you are a smoke seller.
Hydrogel has been used in medicine since 1932, and you are trying to fool some that this is the cause of the deaths that have occurred since 2021? You have to be miserable to keep fooling people.
Also please give me your best description of the pathway which causes the onset of rapid clotting in a persons body without hydrogel and or tonnes of proteins polymerizing? This will be fun......... I am sure many will be interested in the logic you provide here. I genuinely would love you to educate me and others.
Thank you MR. PERI.
That someone who calls himself a doctor asks me this says a lot about his professional training!! Don't you know what research is? Are you from Ryan Cole and Co.?
There are many scientific studies that show that graphene oxide is a supercoagulant and causes blood clots.
Here are some, there are more, Mr. Doctor:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328338305_Graphene_Oxide_Touches_Blood_In_Vivo_Interactions_of_Bio-Coronated_2D_Materials
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21574593/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100922
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1849906/
Demonstrate how hydrogel produces MAC addresses!!! Either it produces neurodegeneration, or it attacks the liver, or the kidney, or it produces infertility, or it attacks the heart, inflaming it. Or how it produces magnetism in people. You are miserable!!
I repeat, you have to be miserable to continue deceiving people, and on top of that, charge them money to continue deceiving!!! Fortunately, more and more people know how to identify fake scientists dressed in white coats.
It has been done by other scientists such as clifford carnicom and by others in Europe. The morphology of polymers and hydrogel is not anything like the construction of graphene based nano technology, it may be involved. If you cannot see that from the images or see that we have even dyed those structures and performed other techniques that showed synthetic polymer structures such as the actual spherulites forming then I guess it is best for you to go with the graphene story. Exotic proteins and RNA, DNA and various other stuff has been identified and exposed publicly online from credible sources, these are the kinds of material that compliment hydrogel born scaffolds, not graphene BASED forms which are simpler when used alone. Please go do your own homework and quit cheer leading others work for which you do not understand. No one is saying it does not contain some graphene, It is just not by far the main ingredient across the broad range of constituents involved in the whole package respecting the knowledge that is driven to us by several sources and not just the shots. Hydrogel is a matrix which can hold cargo (the base materials) and the constructors. It is all you need to create any scaffolding tech from, whether bio or nano. It can hold multiple scaffolds. I don't think you understand how hydrogels work, or what their applications are. You insight that hydrogels are just a harmless medical product, this absolutely proves you know nothing of hydrogel at all. Many of the most nefarious nano, transhuman type bio-warfare products show on papers to be based on hydrogels, gazzilions of papers have been posted by the public highlighting that fact. What an earth are you saying MR EXPERT PERI?
Cute that you think we are completely and utterly stupid, but also kind of insulting. Oh and by the way, if it was Graphene then science lab safety procedure documents would indicate that H202 is an extremely effective detox and removal agent for it. SO WHY IS THAT NOT CURING PEOPLE ?
Did I also mention that the La Quinta connection said it was aliens? :D Yep, id go with that one buddy. Doesn't suspect at all. :D
kindest regards.
Where is the chemical analysis of those other scientists you say? What magazine is it published in? Give me scientific proof that a chemical analysis has been done by looking at those graphene ribbons that you present in this substack and that says that it is a hydrogel. Where is? The scientific community wants to see it. Is the work published in a serious magazine? No? That way we can laugh a little.
You and your colleagues are only here to hide the truth about graphene. Everyone knows that you are the False Dissidence, you neither talk about graphene nor cite the work of Dr. Campra (2021) and another dozen doctors who have PUBLISHED his work where they only see graphene oxide.
How curious that all serious scientists publish their work for the rest of the scientific community. But there are charlatans who are hired to hide the truth from others.
Some may be fooled here, but the entire world already knows what is killing people, with scientific evidence, not quackery.
You've seen the images people post, and you've seen the polymer behavior, hydrogels, protecells etc. Go figure it for yourself. We don't entertaint cheerleaders. I've made an honest point, there may be some graphene involvement, but it is not the main constituent if it is there. We can't detect graphene YET! We need hplc and other devices for that which are on the way. But what we can see with the microscope we have posted and it doesn't look anything like being JUST graphene. I'm sorry you don't like it and make it all personal by implying all kinds of dishonorable things towards us. At the same time we are only being honest from what we've been seeing. You are entitled to your opinions also, I only hope that in a little while you don't feel bad for this when you find out that we were likely right. We can actually clearly see these other constituents and it is not a solely graphene built technology at all. There is a lot more than that going on. That's our point on this right now, and it is what we spend everyday trying to do.......find the truth. You are not helping us by creating big cheerleader rants for Dr campra. Please go pretend to be a an all knowing genius elsewhere and leave the insult there too. I am not ammused to play child's games as if I find this stuff fun. I gave up my entire life to work on this stuff and I didn't do it to deal with misinformation wars. Respectively, tread carefully when you do not understand enough about what you are seeing in images or morphology micrographs. You do not have the knowledge to doubt what we have shown so far, all you can do is hope that the one narrative you have chosen to follow is the right one and preach it elsewhere, we have no time for this kind of great thinking. Sorry, but save us all the know it all fan club attitude. Kindest regards!
Respectfully Karl, you have the patience of a mountain way higher than Everest.
Truth wins. KK
Well, maybe I sound a bit annoyed there. I just can't stand the silly logic considering what we are dealing with. Thanks for being a star. I've been sooooo busy I haven't been ae to catch up this week, but I plan on catching up with you soon. Forgot my password for mail box and had to reset it, so I can't read last weeks messages without remembering the old password to access those. Chat soon hopefully x