Live blood checks part 2 - clarification
(live blood microscopy in the nano-age)
I realise that the post from yesterday requires a bit of clarification…
I first saw structures in my blood in April 2022. This was one of the images:
This was taken by a pathology colleague who has had 20 years experience looking at blood with dark field microscopy. He reported that these structures were initially only seen in vaccinated people but within 3 months these structures were seen in everybody.
By mid July 2022 I had a microscope with a darkfield condenser on my desk and I was looking myself. By early November 2022 I contributed to an article in the Spectator magazine entitled Wot’s in the Shot’s? and by late November I had written a follow up article What’s in the blood? in which I described what I was seeing at that time. In March 2023 I held a small microscopy meeting in Brisbane focussed on learning more about what we were seeing in the blood. It was clear that things have changed over time and they continue to change now. In September last year most blood I looked at did not have large or even moderate amounts of hydrogel nor did they have large amounts of particles in the blood - now almost all blood samples do.
My presumption over this time is that these structures must be in the blood - how could it be otherwise? When I first saw these they appeared as much a part of the blood as the red cells.
However as the hydrogel contamination has increased another possibility has emerged - that of rapid precipitation of polymers in the hydrogel, on the slide, in response to any one, or a combination of factors, e.g temp, pH, oxygen exposure. I suggest evidence for this might be the close proximity of the structures and the 'bubbles' as the bubbles may provide a different environment that encourages this precipitation in some way e.g.:
The structures in the blood, until the last two weeks anyway , have not resembled the technology that I have seen associated with Pfizer Comirnaty or other injectable medications. (more soon on this!)
I have never seen any structure in the blood that compares with this wire. Darkfield 20x objective:
or has this level of functionality. Brightfield 10x objective:
Nor have I seen anything that compares to the elegance of the technology in the Septodont dental anaesthetic. Darkfield 20x objective:
And of course the videos of the construction/de-construction process in Pfizer and the complex chemistry in Septodont is breath-taking.
The structures in the blood are sophisticated in their own right. But I suspect they have formed in a place that was not intended. I think it is a consequence of the hydrogel encountering conditions on the slide that promotes the precipitation of polymers.
At a simple level proteins can fold into different 3D structures some of which are soluble and some insoluble. I propose that the structures we are seeing, and have been seeing in the blood are the result of changes within the hydrogel. In this way, the structures form on the slide in the time it takes to put the blood on the slide, apply the coverslip and arrange the slide on the scope.
At the end of my last visit I checked 2 peoples blood in a low/minimal EMF environment. I need to repeat this but there seemed to be significant differences in appearances of the hydrogel and structures seen which is interesting. Karl and I have discussed the fact that the hydrogel may be energy agnostic in that it may respond to multiple types of energy, e.g. EMF, light, magnetism. Here are two ribbons that formed in a low EMF environment. I have to make a more thorough check of my photos but I do not recall this type of fibre occurring in other samples recently. These two similar structures were in different samples.
It’s more than just hydrogel though and as Karl pointed out it contains nanoparticles, gels, and probably PEG, Q-dots and other nanomaterials - colloquially referred to from now on as “the soup”. I hope that activated charcoal and sodium citrate will prove effective in removing and deactivating “the soup”. Results so far appear promising, as does removal from EMF. Bring me my tinfoil hat.
David
thanks for the support!
Are you familiar with the research by the group La Quinta Columna? Their website is a great resource! NAC was effective at removing the graphene oxide from 3 of my employees who received the injections.
How do I know? Magnets stuck to their injections sites (something I'd seen in a presentation by LA Quinta Columna in 2021) and they gave off EMFs after injection. I purchased a high end EMF detector, independently tested at a lab, and replicated what I'd seen done by the doctors and scientists of La Quinta Columna.
They suggested NAC, which is a precursor to Glutathione produced by the liver. At 500mg 2Xs a day for 30 days my 3 employees no longer emitted EMFs. I downloaded the Mac Finder App, and more recently WiGLE WiGi which demonstrates the vacinated give off MAC numbers like your Bluetooth devices, but there is no "Hardware" no Brand associated with these addresses. Try it yourselves. Now my guys no longer give off MAC addresses. I take a number of adaptogens and NAC daily to continue to detox my body from the poisons.
You might want to ask whether people were PCR tested as well, as these tests also appear contaminated in many cases. Perhaps that's what the source is in the unvaxxed. I have never had a test, so I'll be interested in seeing if I see any of this in my blood. Microscope is coming soon.