Excellent...absolutely excellent observation. Let me hasten to say that I've loosely followed LQC after their initial investigations into graphene.
A strong tendency exists for messianic fervor in these times. You are equally correct that, once occult and extra-sensory explanations enter the picture (which I, too, believe), divergences be…
Excellent...absolutely excellent observation. Let me hasten to say that I've loosely followed LQC after their initial investigations into graphene.
A strong tendency exists for messianic fervor in these times. You are equally correct that, once occult and extra-sensory explanations enter the picture (which I, too, believe), divergences become greatly enlarged through the failure of language to support a cohesive picture among these activities.
The human desire to help in this very troubling epoch is a double-edged sword because ego enters the picture from which messianism flowers. However, no one pursues anything without involving their ego. Ego makes us advance and progress. We're multi-faceted beings fully physical developing spiritual expertise. Unfortunately, ego hinders rather than helps spiritual development until mastered.
Many occult explanations, too, may be valid but occultism is valid according to the success of the initiate. True initiates are exceedingly rare. The individual would have to exert as much effort in their occult studies and endeavors as in their science. They would have to be a monk devoted to science.
However, the unfortunate fact is, as you indicate, that the occult paradigm adopted by anyone can shape their science. Indeed...isn't all science shaped by the innate assumptions inherent within any given system? Once light, sound, and energy are understood from a multi-dimensional viewpoint, how valid will Newtonian mechanics be?
I think you're 100% correct that the science must be rigorously accentuated above all else. Occultism can become valid for an individual as more science is derived and furthers that particular individual's value system or religion. I don't see the human species at a level where commonality can be found in occult or spiritual language. Current science does offer a commonality.
I might add that I've read a great many psychics, and many of their insights and predictions have been proven true...startlingly so in some instances. Moreover, I find an immense shared vision among them; however, they've also been extraordinarily wrong in many instances.
I am glad you brought up and emphasized those very points. There is nothing more prone to refraction and occlusion than "spiritual" or "psychic" insight. This is, as you point out, due to the susceptibility of the ego to follow its own interests as opposed to the objectivity of the "higher self". For this reason, clairvoyant predictions have such a speckled and contradictory history of accuracy and error. Science, or scientism as it has generally degraded into, suffers from the same innate corruptibility due to the influence of ego. The prospect of a Spiritual Science, as formalized by Dr. Rudolf Steiner (and postulated empirically by Dr. Wilhelm Reich) provide real foundations for a New Knowledge - in direct contrast to the false bazaars or a New Age. In fact, the New Age ~ a CIA manipulated movement if ever there was one because it debilitates the urgent need for critical thinking and personal accountability ~ dovetails directly into the malevolent rise of a New Dawn. The late Jordan Maxwell clearly demonstrated how the iconic symbolism of a New Dawn and a New World Order percolates through all masonic and Illuminati material, basically informing and underwriting what is promulgated today at the UN, WHO, WEF etc. The most far reaching insights into the range of alien technologies at work in the current onslaught on humanity and planet earth depend upon an understanding of Reich's work with orgonotics and the nefarious direct attacks on him by malevolent ETs in conjunction with government forces. I have already spoken elsewhere about the discoveries of Dr. Roger Leir, which strongly influenced the trajectory of LQC. Their particular apocalyptic/messianic approach is based on traditional Catholicism and it blends demonism with the acknowledgment of extraterrestrial entities first exptiated upon by Salvador Freixedo (The Human Farm/La Granja Humana). They are not wrong in conflating these two phenomena, but there is at this time a generalized confusion as to how (if) they can even be conceptualized independently of one another. This is a similar confusion, in a sense, to that pertaining in discussions of self-assemblage versus nano-robotics. As to the latter, I have not yet seen a philosophical and phenomenological analysis of the dilemmas of interpretation. The idea that visible timed-based assemblage performed by nano-robots acting in a mechanical manner is ontologically and fundamentally different from non-visible forces involved in the construction of graphenated nano-circuits, routers and other devices is no more than an assumption, certainly not a fact.
I began studying and watching Gigi Young's (self-professed mystic and proponent of feminine mystery schools) videos in 2022 because she made an extraordinary claim. During a Dark Journalist segment, which I found via a third-party article, she questioned why "an alien" from across the galaxy would need human DNA from Earth...which was an explanation I accepted as I saw no other. Even an extraordinary psychic like E. M. Nicolay fell for this tale.
Following Steiner's thought, she sees "aliens" as devolved humans (their inner spirituality is reflected in their atrophied bodies...hence, "Greys") who are fighting to reintegrate themselves into a human form which will allow them to continue evolution in the organic life wave. Of course, their spirituality is so skewed that they envision evolution as their being God and Rulers of the Universe.🤣 Honestly, if the times weren't so perilous, it would be funny.
Otherwise, they're doomed to a Steiner-like 8th Sphere or complete disintegration and restart at Saturn. Hence, their insistence and funding on genetic biohacking and research. I see them as connected to the highest level of Bloodline Families...those who purposefully train their young to interact with them psychically and spiritually.
Since I come from a practical and practicing Buddhist background, I have an understanding of the the individual and environment as one. As they say, "Two but not two" so her explanation made inherent sense to me.
I see spiritual science developing as humans begin acquiring what we term "psychic" abilities as we progress toward New Jupiter. The language will, then, be available. I find quite humorous that so many readers misunderstand Steiner because they have little experience in their lives with any understanding outside rational faculties.
Ah...so interesting concerning the philosophic basis for self-assemblage. Very well done. The trouble with Western religion is the myopic inherent duality. As I mentioned in the paragraph below while observing a nano-crystal-like structure Dr. Nixon pointed out, the object both disappears and reappears. While in the "disappeared" state, it exists. I can see something "there." Of course, this approach is very Eastern--being and not being but all are being. To live and to not live or "die" is all life.
I very much appreciate this conversation. Thank you. A breath of fresh air! Unconscious entrapment in dualism and makes all perception sclerotic. Mechanical rationalism and irrational mysticism (in the sense of blind faith and gullibility) are the two clattering wings which keep us imprisoned and unable to fly. I will try to reply to your points about the Greys when I have more time. Robert Monroe's direct findings plus those discussed by Trevor James Constable seem most apropos to me, amongst many other valuable sources. As for Steiner, I am not too far away geographically from Dornach :)
Excellent...absolutely excellent observation. Let me hasten to say that I've loosely followed LQC after their initial investigations into graphene.
A strong tendency exists for messianic fervor in these times. You are equally correct that, once occult and extra-sensory explanations enter the picture (which I, too, believe), divergences become greatly enlarged through the failure of language to support a cohesive picture among these activities.
The human desire to help in this very troubling epoch is a double-edged sword because ego enters the picture from which messianism flowers. However, no one pursues anything without involving their ego. Ego makes us advance and progress. We're multi-faceted beings fully physical developing spiritual expertise. Unfortunately, ego hinders rather than helps spiritual development until mastered.
Many occult explanations, too, may be valid but occultism is valid according to the success of the initiate. True initiates are exceedingly rare. The individual would have to exert as much effort in their occult studies and endeavors as in their science. They would have to be a monk devoted to science.
However, the unfortunate fact is, as you indicate, that the occult paradigm adopted by anyone can shape their science. Indeed...isn't all science shaped by the innate assumptions inherent within any given system? Once light, sound, and energy are understood from a multi-dimensional viewpoint, how valid will Newtonian mechanics be?
I think you're 100% correct that the science must be rigorously accentuated above all else. Occultism can become valid for an individual as more science is derived and furthers that particular individual's value system or religion. I don't see the human species at a level where commonality can be found in occult or spiritual language. Current science does offer a commonality.
I might add that I've read a great many psychics, and many of their insights and predictions have been proven true...startlingly so in some instances. Moreover, I find an immense shared vision among them; however, they've also been extraordinarily wrong in many instances.
I am glad you brought up and emphasized those very points. There is nothing more prone to refraction and occlusion than "spiritual" or "psychic" insight. This is, as you point out, due to the susceptibility of the ego to follow its own interests as opposed to the objectivity of the "higher self". For this reason, clairvoyant predictions have such a speckled and contradictory history of accuracy and error. Science, or scientism as it has generally degraded into, suffers from the same innate corruptibility due to the influence of ego. The prospect of a Spiritual Science, as formalized by Dr. Rudolf Steiner (and postulated empirically by Dr. Wilhelm Reich) provide real foundations for a New Knowledge - in direct contrast to the false bazaars or a New Age. In fact, the New Age ~ a CIA manipulated movement if ever there was one because it debilitates the urgent need for critical thinking and personal accountability ~ dovetails directly into the malevolent rise of a New Dawn. The late Jordan Maxwell clearly demonstrated how the iconic symbolism of a New Dawn and a New World Order percolates through all masonic and Illuminati material, basically informing and underwriting what is promulgated today at the UN, WHO, WEF etc. The most far reaching insights into the range of alien technologies at work in the current onslaught on humanity and planet earth depend upon an understanding of Reich's work with orgonotics and the nefarious direct attacks on him by malevolent ETs in conjunction with government forces. I have already spoken elsewhere about the discoveries of Dr. Roger Leir, which strongly influenced the trajectory of LQC. Their particular apocalyptic/messianic approach is based on traditional Catholicism and it blends demonism with the acknowledgment of extraterrestrial entities first exptiated upon by Salvador Freixedo (The Human Farm/La Granja Humana). They are not wrong in conflating these two phenomena, but there is at this time a generalized confusion as to how (if) they can even be conceptualized independently of one another. This is a similar confusion, in a sense, to that pertaining in discussions of self-assemblage versus nano-robotics. As to the latter, I have not yet seen a philosophical and phenomenological analysis of the dilemmas of interpretation. The idea that visible timed-based assemblage performed by nano-robots acting in a mechanical manner is ontologically and fundamentally different from non-visible forces involved in the construction of graphenated nano-circuits, routers and other devices is no more than an assumption, certainly not a fact.
I began studying and watching Gigi Young's (self-professed mystic and proponent of feminine mystery schools) videos in 2022 because she made an extraordinary claim. During a Dark Journalist segment, which I found via a third-party article, she questioned why "an alien" from across the galaxy would need human DNA from Earth...which was an explanation I accepted as I saw no other. Even an extraordinary psychic like E. M. Nicolay fell for this tale.
Following Steiner's thought, she sees "aliens" as devolved humans (their inner spirituality is reflected in their atrophied bodies...hence, "Greys") who are fighting to reintegrate themselves into a human form which will allow them to continue evolution in the organic life wave. Of course, their spirituality is so skewed that they envision evolution as their being God and Rulers of the Universe.🤣 Honestly, if the times weren't so perilous, it would be funny.
Otherwise, they're doomed to a Steiner-like 8th Sphere or complete disintegration and restart at Saturn. Hence, their insistence and funding on genetic biohacking and research. I see them as connected to the highest level of Bloodline Families...those who purposefully train their young to interact with them psychically and spiritually.
Since I come from a practical and practicing Buddhist background, I have an understanding of the the individual and environment as one. As they say, "Two but not two" so her explanation made inherent sense to me.
I see spiritual science developing as humans begin acquiring what we term "psychic" abilities as we progress toward New Jupiter. The language will, then, be available. I find quite humorous that so many readers misunderstand Steiner because they have little experience in their lives with any understanding outside rational faculties.
Ah...so interesting concerning the philosophic basis for self-assemblage. Very well done. The trouble with Western religion is the myopic inherent duality. As I mentioned in the paragraph below while observing a nano-crystal-like structure Dr. Nixon pointed out, the object both disappears and reappears. While in the "disappeared" state, it exists. I can see something "there." Of course, this approach is very Eastern--being and not being but all are being. To live and to not live or "die" is all life.
I'll have to subscribe to your newsletter.
I very much appreciate this conversation. Thank you. A breath of fresh air! Unconscious entrapment in dualism and makes all perception sclerotic. Mechanical rationalism and irrational mysticism (in the sense of blind faith and gullibility) are the two clattering wings which keep us imprisoned and unable to fly. I will try to reply to your points about the Greys when I have more time. Robert Monroe's direct findings plus those discussed by Trevor James Constable seem most apropos to me, amongst many other valuable sources. As for Steiner, I am not too far away geographically from Dornach :)
I'll keep up with you through your substack. Conversation enjoyed on this side, too.