Thanks. Very well said. You are quite right in pointing out that observing such a crystal like this over time would be very helpful. I didn't do this with this one and admittedly need some help in understanding the basics of time lapse photography. Thanks again for your well thought out comments.
What type of saline product is this? I looked up medifarma.com.pe and I found eye drops or contact solution. My Spanish is very limited. I'm not sure if I even have the correct company. Thank you!
I just heard a story (which I don't want to go into) that is making me reconsider the wisdom of specifying product names. What I will say is that 4 out of 5 saline brands I've tested contained some things that looked concerning to me in them. I've seen odd strands, things that looked like parasites, etc. The less concerning brand had things in it that I couldn't hazard a guess about. Lots of rainbow patterns - whatever that means. Some people are making their own saline these days, but I haven't tried it myself.
Well articulated, science remains open ended always. You’re a lovely guy Dr. Nixon, stating your hypothesis’ within the context of the desires of the global groups stated goals for humanity, yet leaving room for being wrong.
Ultimately what we need is someone to document the process starting from sample collection (including full “chain of custody”) to the final ‘product’ as an unedited and unredacted livestream, including the addition and removal or various environmental factors such as WiFi and other EMF.
1. Collect Sample
2. Place in a faraday cage
3. Leave for a couple of hours
4. Remove from faraday cage
5. Leave for a couple of hours
6. Put back in a Faraday cage
7. Record final outcome
All the above needs to be livestreamed in real-time. No edits. No cuts.
I think that by following this process, we can finally get clarity on the FACTS, at the very least.
Something like that... However, since Everything is pretty much bathed in EMFs along the manufacturing and distribution process before being put on the slide- hence why some structures come out of the bottle or carpule already as intact microstructures– I'm not sure if that's the procedure.
1. Are these artificial materials/organisms/nanotech/bioengineering agents REAL? Do they actually exist?
2. What do they respond to in terms of activation and deactivation?
Once the above is confirmed definitively and beyond ANY reasonable doubt, we can move to:
3. How can we DISRUPT them?
4. How can we DESTROY them and remove them from the environment altogether?
I am no expert by any means but I think such a structured approach to this challenge will be extremely beneficial and the (proper) use of the scientific method is the best way to go about it.
As an example to my point above, here is one researcher (who appears well qualified prima facie to my very unprofessional eye) who is raising some concerns that appear quite valid to me (again, prima facie to my very unprofessional eye):
I will have a proper read tomorrow but I think the main reason around the need to prove existence is due to the concern that some people raised that some of the observed structures are the result of contaminants either in the vials or due to the lack of a proper controlled environment for such work, namely sterile clean rooms along the lines of what professional research-grade laboratories utilise.
I definitely don't know if such controlled environment (or lack thereof) will make a difference to the sort of work you and your colleagues do but I am merely relaying the concerns raised by some people, including those who claim to have a professional background in work of this nature.
I have addressed this isse in my latest post. A better question I think is 'what would it look like if there was nanotech in our medications?' the answer is, imo, '
Well, they are certainly "real", given the horrors seen in the blood of individuals "pre-covid" vs. "post-covid". Ask ANY Live Blood Analyst who has 6 or more years of experience under their belt, and they will tell you the pre-covid vs. post-covid blood profiles are not even comparable. And when I first saw the the work of Dr. Nixon and Karl C's microscopy of what should be innocuous medical materials (Rapid C19 tests, vaccines, anesthetics), I was shocked to say the least. There should not be ANY solid phases that "self-assemble" out of a liquid phase, nor should there be any violent, tortuous mixing of thousands of micelle-like structures upon the simple evaporation of a something that is injected into patients on a daily basis....this "absent" any outside energy source. And it isn't too big a leap from seeing apparent "synthetic biology" at the microscopic level to the ghastly abnormal blood clots at the macroscopic level. I spent 5 years dissecting rats and I've never seen white clots like that in my life....which keep on "growing" in the petri dish. Just like Bill Gates said, right? Just keep "messing around" with "self-assembling" materials???
Thanks Steve for that reminder. I was asked recently "if the nanotech is in the vaccines - why aren't we seeing it in the blood?"d the answser is of course yes we are - but this reality is not penetrating very far - let's change that this year!
While it's true that many engineered nano particles were deliberately placed in the vaxx and many other everyday products and the atmosphere through chemtrails, it's also true that the natural environment in general has been under the influence of EMF fields at a level never before seen in history. And so some of what we're seeing could be the effects of unnaturally high EMF fields on natural chemistry and natural biology, in addition to the deliberately engineered products.
Thanks. Very well said. You are quite right in pointing out that observing such a crystal like this over time would be very helpful. I didn't do this with this one and admittedly need some help in understanding the basics of time lapse photography. Thanks again for your well thought out comments.
What type of saline product is this? I looked up medifarma.com.pe and I found eye drops or contact solution. My Spanish is very limited. I'm not sure if I even have the correct company. Thank you!
I just heard a story (which I don't want to go into) that is making me reconsider the wisdom of specifying product names. What I will say is that 4 out of 5 saline brands I've tested contained some things that looked concerning to me in them. I've seen odd strands, things that looked like parasites, etc. The less concerning brand had things in it that I couldn't hazard a guess about. Lots of rainbow patterns - whatever that means. Some people are making their own saline these days, but I haven't tried it myself.
Well articulated, science remains open ended always. You’re a lovely guy Dr. Nixon, stating your hypothesis’ within the context of the desires of the global groups stated goals for humanity, yet leaving room for being wrong.
Blessings in the new year 😎
I think you make some excellent points David!
Ultimately what we need is someone to document the process starting from sample collection (including full “chain of custody”) to the final ‘product’ as an unedited and unredacted livestream, including the addition and removal or various environmental factors such as WiFi and other EMF.
1. Collect Sample
2. Place in a faraday cage
3. Leave for a couple of hours
4. Remove from faraday cage
5. Leave for a couple of hours
6. Put back in a Faraday cage
7. Record final outcome
All the above needs to be livestreamed in real-time. No edits. No cuts.
I think that by following this process, we can finally get clarity on the FACTS, at the very least.
Something like that... However, since Everything is pretty much bathed in EMFs along the manufacturing and distribution process before being put on the slide- hence why some structures come out of the bottle or carpule already as intact microstructures– I'm not sure if that's the procedure.
That's fine. Putting them into a Faraday cage is intended to test whether EMF contributes to further growth/assembly or not.
It is quite likely these materials/structures respond to environmental factors. We just need to determine to which ones and to what extent.
This will be the first step in figuring out how to destroy, or at the very least neutralise them.
What questions are you hoping to answer?
1. Are these artificial materials/organisms/nanotech/bioengineering agents REAL? Do they actually exist?
2. What do they respond to in terms of activation and deactivation?
Once the above is confirmed definitively and beyond ANY reasonable doubt, we can move to:
3. How can we DISRUPT them?
4. How can we DESTROY them and remove them from the environment altogether?
I am no expert by any means but I think such a structured approach to this challenge will be extremely beneficial and the (proper) use of the scientific method is the best way to go about it.
Thanks Michael. You raise some important points and issues so I have written a separate article to expand on the points.
As an example to my point above, here is one researcher (who appears well qualified prima facie to my very unprofessional eye) who is raising some concerns that appear quite valid to me (again, prima facie to my very unprofessional eye):
https://rumble.com/v5joklh-no-nanobots-in-mrna-vaccines-just-lipids-on-the-loose.html
Prof Urlich does not however address a number of key issues but does have a very loud "there is nothing to see here" plkease see Dan's reply https://cdn.manula.com/user/15577/docs/175092024-broudy-lee-to-ulrich-db-final-edits-15092024-2024-09-16-19-24-58-utc.pdf
Thanks David. I am humbled.
I will have a proper read tomorrow but I think the main reason around the need to prove existence is due to the concern that some people raised that some of the observed structures are the result of contaminants either in the vials or due to the lack of a proper controlled environment for such work, namely sterile clean rooms along the lines of what professional research-grade laboratories utilise.
I definitely don't know if such controlled environment (or lack thereof) will make a difference to the sort of work you and your colleagues do but I am merely relaying the concerns raised by some people, including those who claim to have a professional background in work of this nature.
I have addressed this isse in my latest post. A better question I think is 'what would it look like if there was nanotech in our medications?' the answer is, imo, '
it would look exactly like it does....'
Well, they are certainly "real", given the horrors seen in the blood of individuals "pre-covid" vs. "post-covid". Ask ANY Live Blood Analyst who has 6 or more years of experience under their belt, and they will tell you the pre-covid vs. post-covid blood profiles are not even comparable. And when I first saw the the work of Dr. Nixon and Karl C's microscopy of what should be innocuous medical materials (Rapid C19 tests, vaccines, anesthetics), I was shocked to say the least. There should not be ANY solid phases that "self-assemble" out of a liquid phase, nor should there be any violent, tortuous mixing of thousands of micelle-like structures upon the simple evaporation of a something that is injected into patients on a daily basis....this "absent" any outside energy source. And it isn't too big a leap from seeing apparent "synthetic biology" at the microscopic level to the ghastly abnormal blood clots at the macroscopic level. I spent 5 years dissecting rats and I've never seen white clots like that in my life....which keep on "growing" in the petri dish. Just like Bill Gates said, right? Just keep "messing around" with "self-assembling" materials???
Thanks Steve for that reminder. I was asked recently "if the nanotech is in the vaccines - why aren't we seeing it in the blood?"d the answser is of course yes we are - but this reality is not penetrating very far - let's change that this year!
While it's true that many engineered nano particles were deliberately placed in the vaxx and many other everyday products and the atmosphere through chemtrails, it's also true that the natural environment in general has been under the influence of EMF fields at a level never before seen in history. And so some of what we're seeing could be the effects of unnaturally high EMF fields on natural chemistry and natural biology, in addition to the deliberately engineered products.
Excellent argument. Well presented!